Friday 25 November 2011

Everyone's a Brand Consultant today - choose wisely.

(PRWEB) July 22, 2004

by Q. Malandrino, Chairman & CEO - BrandLink Corporation - q@brandlink.com - http://www.brandlink.com (see the Q Notes!) - 001.212.431.0802


Everyone's a Brand Consultant today – choose wisely.


Get a true Brand Consultant to create a brand’s foundations. Then let other


specialists bring them to life.


It’s a fact that how a company is perceived is important toward business


success, and many different professionals claim that they can help with


optimizing perception. Ergo, everyone does ‘branding’, and everyone is a


‘brand consultant.’ How’s that possible? Just a few years back everyone had


a specialty. Did they all study ‘branding’ really hard and become an expert?


If that’s the case, please tell me where that textbook is – I’d love to read


it! But there’s no textbook, and there is a reason.


Once upon a time, there were many specialist communications professionals,


who respected the others’ unique skills, and clients knew who was good at


what. Branding as a discrete discipline didn’t really exist, and the word


Brand was used only in reference to trusted consumer products. In the early


1990s, the term Brand started to be applied to corporate entities as well as


to b2b companies – and the revolution began. Every business organization


wanted to become ‘a brand’, and all communications professionals rushed to


add ‘branding’ to their names and become ‘brand consultants’. Mind you,


virtually nobody bothered to define this new discipline, nor its precise


components; everybody just grabbed the term and made it the umbrella for


their own historical competency.


As a result, today countless practitioners say they do ‘Branding’, and


‘create brands’: Identity and Naming firms, Ad agencies, P.R. firms, Promo


Agencies, every type of Design firm, Management Consultants, Research firms,


Marketing Strategists, College Professors, HR and O.D. experts, Licensing


firms, and more; and the vast majority of them comes from consumer goods


marketing – where Branding has a different meaning and uses different tools


than in the b2b universe. Finally, to round out the cast of characters,


there are many 'brand thinkers’ - people who present credible-sounding


theories but cannot show you real-life case histories from paying clients,


plus real-project client references. Oh yes, virtually all of these


professionals have written a book on Branding.


“OK”, you might say “enough with the history lesson. Tell me who is entitled


to use the label ‘Brand Consultant.’” Glad you asked. A true Brand


Consultant creates the strategic foundation of a brand, which is composed of


four conceptual components (Brand Positioning, related Message Segmentation,


the internal Brand Culture framework, and Brand Architecture), and two


visible components (Verbal Identity / names and Visual Identity / logos,


etc.). The term ‘Branding’ is the umbrella term for all of these components.


(On this basis, then ad agencies and the like will work their magic.)


True Brand Consultants believe in those components and in their sequence,


can clearly define them, can explain the interrelationships, and have case


histories that show how they worked in real-life. Also, they will have their


own Brand Positioning. Most importantly, true Brand Consultants believe that


the four conceptual components must be created on the basis of what’s


strategically right – without being influenced by how they might eventually


get communicated. That’s why ad agencies, PR firms and designers are


ill-suited to create a brand foundation: they will create it (that is, if


they do) on the basis of its communications potential, on how unique,


memorable and different they can make it, and within their own purview (if


they want to stay in business, they have to sell you their design,


advertising, research, PR work.).


“So”, you might add “what is it they do, if they are not ‘brand


consultants?’”. Here it is:


– create a corporate visual/verbal Identity (Identity firms)


– create logos, packaging or brochures (design firms) and create brand names


(naming firms)


– shout about + promote a brand (ad agencies) and craft & get brand messages


out (PR firms)


– gather loads of ‘brand-related’ data and then derive brand recommendations


from it (research firms)


– market a company while talking about the importance of ‘brand’ (marketing


strategist)


– address strategy & operations while talking about the importance of


‘brand’ (business consultants)


– address corporate culture (HR and O.D. experts).


Each of their propositions goes something like this: “I am a brand


consultant, the engine of Branding is ... (insert one’s own competency here)


... and as a result of my work you’ll have a strong brand.” Branding and


Brand for them is a by-product of what they actually do and have always


done. Very convenient. A suggestion: if one claims to be an expert, one


should be able to answer a few simple questions:


“Hey, ad agency, have you ever done a 'branding program' that did not


include advertising?”


“Hey, identity firm, have you ever done a 'branding program' that did not


include a new logo?”


“How do you define the discipline of ‘Branding’?” “How’s that different than


Identity?”


“What are the components of Branding?” “Can you define (in plain English,


and in five words or less) each of them? And how do they relate to one


another?”


Also, ask them: “what can you do for me and my Company?” I bet that they’ll


have a prompt answer, because they heard you according to where they sit –


i.e., an ad agency will hear your question as “what can advertising do for


me and my Company?”. Conversely, if you ask a true Brand Consultant s/he


won’t have the answer, because s/he may not know enough about your


challenges, and s/he fully recognizes that the discipline of (true) Branding


may or may not be what’s needed to solve them.


Finally, the promised deliverables from various practitioners all sound


similar. But we all know that talk is cheap. Look more closely – there are


very substantial differences. More specifically:


If you are discussing Brand Positioning:


– did they show you examples like “a global leader committed to performance


with unmatched resources?” (That’s not Brand Positioning; that's "cramming


as many concepts as you can in as few words as possible". You’ll have no use


for it.)


– did they use the words “exceeding expectations”? (an entirely


un-deliverable concept)


– were they only for external audiences, or were they 'slogans' (ad agency’s


typical m.o.)? (if employees don’t ‘live’ it, Brand Positioning has limited


value.)


– were they the result of extensive research (that’s a marketing


strategist’s or research firm’s typical m.o.)? (Positioning is created on


the basis of solid data; it’s not the automatic and direct result of it.)


If you are discussing Brand Architecture:


– did they show you examples of homogeneous sets of branded properties?


(that’s not necessarily good: it’s often the easy way out, it flattens


marketing power, and it’s often simply about organizing your closet, as


opposed to organizing your closet on the basis of what you should wear and


when.)


If you are discussing Brand Culture:


– how did they explain the difference between Corporate Culture and Brand


Culture? (hint: “Brand Culture” is NOT simply “corporate culture + brand.”)


Bottom line(s):


1) get a true Brand Consultant to create your brand’s foundations; it’ll


cost a small fraction of your marketing/ad/PR budget, but it’s money that


will go toward deciding what to say with all that money.


2) don’t let an expert in consumer goods marketing touch your b2b brand


(unless s/he recognizes that it’s a different world, and can articulate the


differences.)


---------





Related Textbooks For Cheap Press Releases

No comments:

Post a Comment